I think based on the information that I have read for Module 2 and 3, I would rather
blog with the completion of each module. Right now, I have a lot to digest.
Module 2:
I truly did feel like I was learning a foreign language but only worse; at least with a foreign language, I have English as prior knowledge. I don’t think I have any prior knowledge with this information. Oh well, I become excited when I am learning new things…
Some of the information in Module 2 made no sense until I did reading for Module 3. I think that was because I began tying all the information together. The history of cataloging was interesting. Libraries have been valued literally for thousands of years. Libraries represented knowledge but more importantly wealth to early people. The job of trying to organize that information would not be as difficult as trying to allow someone else into the library to find something on his or her own. Each library had its own librarian; thus, each librarian had his own system. More interesting is the fact that library organization as a standard did not begin until the 1800’s. Boy did Panizzi have a lot of catching up to do! More importantly, Lubetzky gave us all a headache when he changed things again. Again, this is pretty amazing stuff when you think about the fact that he did not come forth with these thoughts until around 1949. Next, the AACR is written based on Lubetzky’s unpublished work. This pretty much established the process that we use today. If I am understanding things correctly, AACR is like the APA style guide. It tells us how to write entries for the card catalog. ISBD represents international rules for card catalogs and the AACR included those in a revision
in 1974.
This set of rules is still in use today. Revisions and versions continue to be written and released even as I type. A system of writing card catalog entries that uses different terminology is FRBR. FRBR uses words like “work”, “expression”, “manifestation” and “item” to refer to the materials found in the library. (This one I am a little fuzzy on; I think practice will bring at least a clearer understanding.)
Another important term gained from chapter 1 was the bibliographic record. This is a description of the book that gives the patron where to find the book and some information about the book. Bibliographic records are known The Book List, The Card Catalog, and The Electronic Catalog. These are in order from the oldest to most current.
The next important idea is sharing bibliographic information. No need to reinvent the wheel, right? Sharing allows a library to create a new record in a quicker way. The Library of Congress (LoC) played an important role in this by publishing the NUC (National Union Catalog). No, this catalog does NOT contain only the list of books in the LoC. (I knew that on test but didn’t mark that!!) This printed version soon went electronic as early as 1969 in the form of magnetic tapes. From this electronic era comes MARC. MARC was not meant to become a standard, but since it came from the library of all libraries, it has had major influence. The problem with that is the punctuation. MARC does not follow all the AARC rules. (Yes! I think I used an acronym correctly!) As current times approach, another problem develops! What do we do with all this electronic stuff that is available? Dublin Core comes to save the day!!!
Through all this progress, evolution has and is still happening!!! OPAC arrives. What a tangled web we weave with OPAC. OPAC gives anyone doing research the ability to find practically any
information that is needed. No longer are we limited by the traditional title, author, and subject searches of earlier days.
Module 3
Module 3 seems to add clarity to some of this information that was presented in Module 2. I am guessing that was because I had something to assimilate the information to. I was not even sure I had anything yet!
In this module I learned about copy cataloging and original cataloging. Right now, copy cataloging could be a librarian’s best friend. I do realize that there are differences between my cataloging and copy cataloging, but there are serious benefits for busy librarians. Chapter 2 discussed places to get cataloging information—both free and payment required facilities. The most obvious resource is the library of congress. One thing to realize is that there are discrepancies between the LC entry and the final published work. The entries for the LC are created pre-publication of books, if I understand the information correctly.
Other free databases include Amicus (for Canada), Access Pennsylvania, Genesse Valley BOCES, and Link+. All of these databases have information that can be downloaded. Other good sources that are not downloadable include Clevnet, CowlNet, and Sunlink. One noteworthy database is OCLC. The text says that this is one of the best places to search for records. OCLC is fee-based but created by a non-profit organization.
One program that I felt that is noteworthy is MARC Wizard. MARC Wizard is a program that cleans up catalog records and can print various bar code labels.
I can see that as a librarian there is much work to be done in cataloging. I am really excited about eventually getting to work in a library. I love the idea of collaborating with teachers and having information that I can put in their hands to make life better and easier. Cataloging is what will allow my library to run smoothly. WOW!!! I have a lot of work to do someday!!! I can’t wait to start…